home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail
- From: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
- Subject: Re: fastest code
- Date: 8 Apr 1996 07:36:24 -0700
- Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
- Message-ID: <4kb898INNqn0@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- References: <316112A2.7D37@public.sta.net.cn> <NFS9dJAHgWYxEwdO@chrism.demon.co.uk> <4k1sntINNdd6@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <FH0GsDAq6iZxEwVz@richardc.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca
-
- In article <FH0GsDAq6iZxEwVz@richardc.demon.co.uk>,
- Richard Clarke <Richard@richardc.demon.co.uk> wrote:
- >In article <4k1sntINNdd6@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>, Kazimir Kylheku
- ><c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> writes
- >>In article <NFS9dJAHgWYxEwdO@chrism.demon.co.uk>,
- >>Chris Marriott <chris@chrism.demon.co.uk> wrote:
- >>>I've heard it said that Watcom have the best compiler in terms of code
- >>>speed. What they do NOT have is a particularly good development
- >>>environment - VC++ is the clear winner in that department.
- >>
- >>Who cares? The end user doesn't see the development environment. It's just
- >>fluff for programmer wannabees.
- >>--
- >>
- >
- >A good development environment makes it more likely that the user will
- >end up with a decent piece of software.
-
- Statistical proof? Definition of ``good development environment''?
- --
-
-